点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
东西问丨短评：2023，如何“贞下起元”？******
中新社北京12月31日电 题：2023，如何“贞下起元”？
中新社记者 安英昭
行至岁末，久违的烟火气重回中国大地。回望2022，地球在动荡中运转，人类在负重下前进。365个日夜，历史见证了美丽与神奇，也目睹着危机与转机。《易经》有言，“元亨利贞”，昨日疫情的“至暗时刻”不应遗忘，冬去春来的明天值得期待。
2023，如何“贞下起元”？
一曰美美与共，推动文明交流互鉴。
图为2022年2月4日晚，第二十四届冬季奥林匹克运动会开幕式上的主火炬。中新社记者 李骏 摄文明之美，无问东西。2022年堪称“体育大年”，年初的冬奥会让北京再次惊艳世界，年底的世界杯让世人重新认识了卡塔尔。令人难忘的是，谷爱凌实力圈粉的同时，羽生结弦在遗憾中退隐；球王贝利弥留之际，见证了梅西率队举起大力神杯。这些瞬间，正因全世界观众的共享而定格成经典，人类的共情在体育世界中历久弥新。
透过体育这扇窗，可洞见文明久久不息的火光。鸟巢上空“天下一家”(One World One Family)的焰火，诉说着中华文明的博爱与包容；海湾球场内“此刻即所有”(Now is All)的口号，抒发出阿拉伯文明对人类团结的呼吁。顾拜旦歌颂体育“在各民族间建立愉快的联系”“使全世界的青年学会相互尊重和学习”，在文明冲突论时有所闻的今天，“现代奥林匹克之父”的箴言仍具启示意义。
二曰求同存异，共同应对危机挑战。
图为当地时间2022年3月8日，乌克兰基辅郊区，当地民众撤离伊尔平时，穿过一条在废墟上临时搭建的道路。止战之殇，呼唤和平。2022年的欧洲大陆，随乌克兰危机爆发而笼罩于阴霾之下。但北约东扩的脚步并未停顿，能源问题更雪上加霜。在全球化早已使各国“你打喷嚏我感冒”的今天，欧洲的凛冬已然波及世界。
人类共居小小寰球之上，战争危机、气候变化、粮食安全、难民问题等接踵而至，唯有抛开区分求共对，方能克难前行。世界总人口已逾80亿，为子孙后代计、为永续发展谋，人类文明才能在地球上创造下一个辉煌。
三曰团结合作，集中精力聚焦发展。
未来之路，携手前行。2022年的世界经济，在百年变局叠加世纪疫情的背景下疲态尽显。国际货币基金组织连续4次下调世界经济增速预期，除少数东南亚国家仍有上升外，世界上绝大部分经济体都出现较大幅度回落。
眼下，中国历经一千多个日夜后进入防疫新阶段。许多被迫按下“暂停键”的行业陆续回归，一些濒临破产的企业重拾希望，正如多家机构预测，2023年中国经济发展的底气更足、韧性更强、后劲更大。在以中国式现代化全面推进中华民族伟大复兴的历史进程中，中国将为世界释放更多确定性，注入更多正能量。
过去三年，对于中国和世界都是异常艰难的。经此一“疫”，人们当更坚强。2023，愿人们在交流互鉴中，共享文明多样的芬芳；在求同存异中，共对地球面临的挑战；在团结合作中，共赴人类美好的未来。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)